Skinpress Demo Rss

QAL in UK newspaper!

Filed Under () by Adam Lambert on Monday, January 19, 2015

Posted at : Monday, January 19, 2015

9 comments:

Magiclady said...

Can't seem to be able to read the first review. If I make it bigger it just gets fuzzier. Anybody?

glitzylady said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
glitzylady said...

The First one is from the Daily Telegraph, about the first show at the O2 Arena. It's posted here on 24/7..

"Queen + Adam Lambert, O2 Arena, review: 'spectacular'
No-one can better fill Freddie Mercury's shoes better than Lambert"


And if you click on the link in the tweet, it will take you directly to the article...

Here's the link as well...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/live-music-reviews/11353627/Queen-Adam-Lambert-review.html

LAMBERT Outlaw said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
LAMBERT Outlaw said...

I deleted my comment 'cuz @glitzylady answered your comment before me ... no sense in a double comment. Hope @Magiclady got through to the original article.

tess4ADAM(LAMBERT Outlaw)

glitzylady said...

I suppose I should post the link for the second article as well, also posted here on 24/7..

**The Online Article has a slightly different title than the print review, but same content...

"Queen and Adam Lambert, The O2 - review: 'An all-guns-blazing rock machine' "

http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/music/queen-and-adam-lambert-the-o2--music-review-an-allgunsblazing-rock-machine-9987034.html

yada said...

Thank you, glitzy.... Kind of you. Appreciate what you're doing here, and the extra time you take on the little things (that are in impact, big things).... And all the work getting everything up and posted for us.
Seriously, your admin and monitoring efforts are oustanding. Adam and the Glambert family are blessed to have you! I just hope you know that.. :))

Magiclady said...

Thanks so much guys for helping me!
There are so many wonderful reviews, I am getting confused as to what I have read and what I haven't!

Anonymous said...

John Aizlewood's review has 1 questionable detail. He says Adam is young enough to be Brian & Roger's grandson (or words to that effect)!! Roger is 33 years older than Adam & Brian is 35 years older than Adam - an age to be Adam's father but questionably an age to be his grandfather.