Adam Lambert 24/7 News

And this is_______.

It's not a website, it's a page.

Looks the same to me as before. Did they change something? Or barbls23 hadn't seen it before?

So most likely Adam's recording / music label is managed by Direct Management Group, an international music company; rather promising and ready to go for Adam's 3rd album; not bad at all.

Lam-my, Adam's management doesn't have anything to do with the label. They perform two entirely different roles. Adam has been with DMG for a couple years now.

10:57.....Please read my comment more carefully...poor comprehension !!

Direct Management Group doesn't manage labels. They likely helped Adam negotiate a contract with a label but they don't manage the label he signed with. Not sure what you are talking about Lam-my. Poor writing skills seems more the issue than poor reading comprehension. But then you are never wrong so never mind.

'manage' here must be taken in a broad sense...in my layman term, it means help Adam secure his recording contract or label and see to its workings; don't know the actual procedure but I know it is not DMG, Adam's day to day management; I never said that, it's your own distorted poor comprehending of my comment. In any case, it's just a general comment, no need for squabbling over!

And since you have presumed I'm never wrong...why did you even bother to address the issue to me...you contradict yourself, digging your own grave!

"don't know the actual procedure but I know it is not DMG". What?

Poor comprehension again! Wake up!

If you wish to continue this conversation that leads nowhere, please state your name!!

STFU Lam-my.

Same to you 120 % !! Where's your name? Coward! to the max.

Lam-my, why do you make things unpleasant 'round here? We're all here to support Adam but we don't have to think the same.

3:17.....Please state your name !! Another nameless faceless coward or the same one ?

I don't get it either and not bothering to sign in either.

@Lam-My - I also misunderstood your first comment. For some people here - like me - english is not the first language, so there could be some misunderstandings. This has not always something to do with "comprehesion".

DMG is Adams management, they helped him negogiating his deal with a new label. That is how I understand it too.

It would be great to just clear up some misunderstandings without insulting each other.

It's better to ask Adam!!!:)))

Ladies just hold your horses and be nice!!:) Everyone of us wants to share opinions and it's healthy as long as we respect each other he!he!

Canadian

They haven't done shit for Adam the past 2 years. So disappointing!

His new LABEL better do a superb job of promoting A3 and some strong singles. Bottom line for me.

@Molly R
Kudos to your post, and extra special mention to the last paragraph! Hear, hear!

The posts by Lammy where she is belittling other posters' comprehension should be deleted. She does it every time someone disagrees with her or questions her post or part of it. Why is she allowed to continue with that? No one else here does that! [trolls excluded]

Adam has a fantastic year this year. I do believe management groupe or not he would have gotten the Queen jobs. They just flat out wanted h and still do.
While Adams doing his own music Brian said they would close up shop for awhile. If Adam did not have to get out his own music they probably could have gone on fine many more concerts. I think we all love the Queen thing. I do think it has gotten Adam more fans. The fantastic X Factor performance and now the NY eve performances and the concerts. These things can only work well for his own music.
We are all looking so forward to A3. I don't understand why did Adam say a few months ago he had a new label we know he has that. But also said new management and people around him. Why would he say he had new management three are four months ago if he still has the same one he had four over two, three years. I am not questioning any thing just wondering.
I can't wait for next year couple months of Queen, breaking in the new year, Vids hopefully from couple months if concerts. Most of all his new album and single. I like many hope he has the best of backing from this new label. Correction that was they may have gone on for many more concerts.
Most important can't wait for Adams own music. I do think Adam may have the best of all years next year. God knows he deserves it! Sue

1:40
Firstly, have the courage to state your name if you call for my comment to be deleted !! You seem to have asked for a deletion of my comment before...Stalker !! No necessity for any deletions...problem can be solved very easily. Simply don't address anything to me and you will not feel the "belittling of your comprehension" !!
I also feel this faceless nameless Anon has be been stalking me for some time and on purpose asking ambiguous questions. None of us knows the exact details of how Adam's management functions and I merely made a general comment to express my joy for Adam getting his recording label. Even if I sounded not clear, there's no need for any dissecting...who cares who is managing what, as long as Adam gets a good deal and releases his albums with a booming sale.
Notification: The faceless nameless Stalker Anon, and also Coward Anon who keeps calling for my deletions, may or may not be the same person...Just don't address anything to me and problem will not even exist !!
Bottomline is I do not want to talk to you, let alone your unnecessary interferences !! even if I come across unclear to you.
I am usually very clear in my comments but with regard Adam's management I might not have been as clear, as I do not know how exactly it functions; and as always gives Stalker Coward Anon a chance to jump on me ! Very irritating!
And yet I have not once picked on one or both of these Stalker Anons, simply because they are Cowards with no names! So they go round finding little faults and asking for my deletions and yet hiding their own name behind a cloak of darkness! The Stalker Anon even used vulgarity in front of my name ! and yet refuses to furnish her name!
Coward faceless Anon 1:40...You should be the one deleted because you have no name and therefore no right whatsoever to call for my deletion! Even if you go to a police-station to lodge a complaint, the first thing they ask for is you identification / ID ! Got it?

I too found Lam-my's original post worded poorly (at least, imho, it was worded poorly in relation to what ultimately seemed to be her intent or point). This is my first post on this thread. I guess it's silly for me to add anything to this misunderstanding at this point, and I wouldn't have, but I felt compelled to extend a bit of support to Dec 6 10:57pm... my goodness, the poor comprehension remark was so needless. Well gee, for the record, also put me in the "poor comprehension" column when it comes to Lam-my's 11:52pm and 1:34am posts, as poor writing doesn't seem to be an option (ever).

The thing is, the Dec 6 10:57pm comment didn't strike this reader as mean spirited or nit-picky, but simply as a statement of possible clarity for consideration. The less than pleasant spirit of the reply at Dec 6 11:52pm that was directed at Dec 6 10:57pm seemed a bit harsh and not called for, imho anyway. I can give you readers a tag, as some here seem so sensitive about Anon posts, a tag like MIM, but it will mean no more than Anon does to most, if not all, reading here.

4:35
I know who you are!! You are the long 'Rigmarole' my name for you...we had an argument on Adam's song 'Underneath' used on the tv show 'The Smoke'. So you think your constant long rigmaroles are not "worded poorly". In fact your long rigmaroles beat around the bush, repetitive emerging with a few unsubstantial points. An Anon once called it "a wall of text". You might also have been the one who once called my comment "icky and crappy, with a disingenuous agenda". Well, Rigmarole lol! your audacity now to critique my comment as "worded poorly". So time to get back I guess! Shame on you, seizing an opportunity!
I already said this Stalker Anon had been on my heels for quite a while and I got irritated regardless if my comment was "poorly worded"; I did say I wasn't sure about how Adam's management works and that she says Adam's management "has got nothing to do with Adam's label" is in itself faulty as well. So you regard that as not poorly worded and mine was. In reality, none of us knows how Adam's management functions in detail so my point was just let it go. Oh but Stalker Anon who has been on my heels for some time wouldn't; just like you now, seizing an opportunity to shoot back. It was out of joy that I risked that "poorly worded" comment which I was hesitant to write and sure enough was quickly picked up by my constant Coward Stalker Anon.
You too have joined the ranks of the Coward Faceless Anons and you should state your name clearly if you are making a judgement on another's comment as "worded poorly". Rigmarole! There I just gave you a name!

OMG.

OK ... here I go into the 'fray of words' ... so shoot if you must this old gray head ... why must evrything & every pic on this site lead to a 'War of Words'? Are we back in grade school? Wrong spelling ... wrong phrasing ... not explicit enough ... so what? I get the gist of most of these posts ... when I don't ... I either ask a courteous question or remain silent and move on to the next post where it may be explained in further detail. Am I a coward? NO ... just a Glambert! Thanx for your time. Peace .. Love 'n Light to ALL!!

tess4ADAM(LAMBERT Outlaw)

ANOTHER thread RUINED!!!!! :((((((

4:11am here .... not referring to you Tess4Adam.

Thanks @tess4ADAM for you reasonable and thoughtful post. It will serve as positive encouragement to me, 4:35 & 4:46 :).

I only came back to this thread, which is probably dead at this point, with the hopes of finding that I had not fanned the flames, so to speak, any further. I actually felt guilty that I even jumped into the thread fray at all. I just felt, when I first read the thread, compelled to throw a little support Dec 6 10:57PM's way, as I didn't personally find that 10:57 comment snide, but rather just offering a possible clarification, and therefore not worthy of an insult, just my POV. In any event, I should have known better, it was almost a sure thing how it would play out, my bad, as the kids say nowadays.

I was happy to see your comment at Dec 7 8:24 tess4ADAM, thank you! With that, I will end with exposing a simple fact (yes FACT), which is that I comment on this blog very infrequently. I often don't even open the comments sections at all, but rather just stick to reading the headlines or major point of the thread. When I do comment, it is usually a "cool" or an "awesome" or a "good for Adam" type of comment, hardly stalker material. At the risk of being redundant, I post in the comments section quite infrequently overall. Thusly, answers for some will have to be sought elsewhere.

Vicious paranoid quarrelsome troublemaker! Masking her inferiority with pompous superiority.
Sensitive but absolutely insensitive to others. Cultivate love of neighbor to cure paranoia.

Wowza 11:29, you captured the essence that Lam-My puts forth (on this blog anyway, who knows about real life) succinctly, but still perfectly.

"succinctly, but still perfectly" - Very poor English.

"succinctly" has the same connotation as "perfectly" in this context, so wrong use of conjunction...should be 'and' not "but".

Wrong usage..."but" does not need to be followed with "still". Usually one or the other suffices as in this case.

No need for a comma after "succinctly," because the conjunction "but" which should be 'and' links the sentence perfectly already.

Hey Faceless Anon ! If you hide and throw stones, usually they go way off the mark. lol!
Now hand over your tuition fee, please!

Lam-My

Do you have any friends?
You are so pitiful.

Faceless Anon...Take care of yourself first...charity begins at home. Hiding and shooting in a cloak of darkness seems a lot more sad !

I'm not your faceless Anon, just someone who feels sorry for someone as lonely as you. Do your grammar skills keep you warm at night?
My name is Cloe.

Cloe...Now make sure you use that name throughout and not just for this comment; and then start your Faceless Anon shooting again ! Coming up with a name is easily done, just flick one from the air. Let's see if you can write Cloe on every of your comment from now onwards...That is the real test ! Otherwise you will still be a Faceless Anon who enjoys shooting at someone who intimidates you. You seem a little addicted to me; even wants to know if I can sleep lol! Why should I let you know ? lol! Like I said, take care of yourself first...you seem to lack self-confidence. I can't help you with that because it has to come from within yourself.

Should be..... "even want to know" above.

Pride and arrogance are the vilest sins in the eyes of God and are punished the most. They're the very sins of Lucifer.
A murderer can come to the point of repentance but not to someone who is so full of himself. You know very well who serves Satan, it's the divider and the destroyer.
Humility is the most pleasing in the eyes of God. Of course, all these mean nothing to one who has no fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom.

Quick to point out the speck in another's eye and yet can't see the mess in your own...is denial and the foundation of evil.

"...no fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom."

Your above sentence is one big booboo! You are actually saying...no fear of God is the beginning of wisdom ? Are you sure ?
And using "which" to refer to God ? The relative pronoun "which" is used for animals and things ! Whoa! Getting from bad to worse.
And yet you want to preach to me. One helluva messy brain you have there, no wonder you are Faceless! Wake up !

Of course, all these mean nothing to one who has no "fear of God" which is the beginning of wisdom.
Excuse me! "Which" refers to the phrase "fear of God" if you are a smart bully and know your Scripture.
You end up arguing unnecessarily about grammar and syntax every time you are hit bullseye.
You are your father whose first sin is PRIDE who you serve well.

"...all these mean nothing to one who has no fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom."

Now you very slyly removes "no" and just pick out "fear of God"...That is not what your sentence states! You cannot just pick and choose your words from your given sentence like you are buying apples. It is what it states! even if I close one eye on the incorrect placing of the relative pronoun "which". I did in fact read it as a phrase which would read as "no fear of God" and not "fear of God". Not only are you Faceless...also muddle-headed.

Should be....."remove"

The whole thread should be removed IMO.

No necessity !

Sorry but Lammy knows no scripture if that is not already very clear. She will keep on with grammar school because she lost the argument.
The worst thing is she thinks she's winning! LOL!